Fanien tiedot
Kommentit
The video doesn't mention the 5th set of the EuroVolley 2026 final?? Are you a psychic and we don't know it, Mihai Zarate?? 😱
For you to have added a video of the EuroVolley final with this year's tournament hashtag, you'd have to be a fortune teller to say that Turkey vs. Serbia will decide the world's biggest continental championship…
It's a shame the game isn't turned on yet, isn't it? Are you perhaps a misunderstood person here, or just someone desperate for points and therefore doing things halfway/poorly…
cruel doubts…
“All Points in Coppa Italia, Conegliano - Scandicci”
But where is the game? Will anyone watching the video have to search for the match? What is the purpose of the "add to match" tab when you add the video? Is it a case of "Ignoring the fact that the video is about a match and not linking it to the video that talks about the video"? If a video shows a complete match that doesn't exist here on Volleybox, what's the point of not creating that match? Ah, I remembered… it's better to put "Match Highlights" so you don't have to add the video linked to the match…
It's kind of annoying that this situation still exists and is only getting worse, isn't it? If a video talks about a match, why not link the corresponding match? What does it cost to search for the match?
I hope that one day, this behavior will improve!
@MihaiZarate Sorry, but that's what appeared to me under your name! Since you change your name periodically, I don't pay that much attention, but I promise I'll keep an eye out for your name so I don't make the same mistake again!
Apparently it doesn't hurt to link the video to the match (that the video talks about), right?? 🤭
If you keep this up, you'll have my respect, Mihai Zarate! Keep it up and eventually you'll be a more respected and liked user here on the platform. 👏🏻
The video is good, but it could have connected the match correctly, right? It's sad to see such a closed mind focused only on ranking points and ignore the fact that if the video is about a match, the user who added the video should (commonly) link it to the corresponding match! Success always, Mzaratem/Mihai Zinate, but I hope you change your behavior here on the platform! Hugs 👏🏻
@NextGenVolley But why did you accept the transfer? Because, as you yourself told me in a message, rumors of transfers would no longer be accepted as official! I kept doing it to see how far the situation would go, because several users were posting unofficial transfers and they were being accepted! When I tried this, I was denied every time!
Adding to that: I noticed that the link used in this transfer (
) doesn't belong to the athlete, the club, or the agency. In other words, the source itself contradicts all the criteria you just listed as mandatory. If the idea is to keep the database of rumors and transfers accurate, why was this exception made specifically here?
Hi @NextGenVolley . It's great to see this concern for data accuracy, especially coming from those who should be setting an example. However, I noticed that Thiago Vaccari's transfer to Vôlei Guarulhos (2026/27) has already been added without any official announcement from the sources you yourself listed as mandatory. It would be interesting if the rules applied to everyone, including those who dictate them, so that the discourse of 'keeping Volleybox accurate' doesn't seem merely selective. Could you explain the criteria used in this specific case?
I think the image clearly contradicts your own statement….
Note: you were the one who added the “transfer”.
@mzaratem All my criticisms directed at you were aimed at creating a better, more organized platform! You were never willing to listen, it's sad to see that your ego went to your head, what a shame!
@mzaratem Me crying? Spare me, Mzaratem, at least I'm not the one who can't listen to constructive criticism and therefore blocks someone, right? You have no argument and you're just trying to get likes! You only care about racking up points, adding who knows how many videos a day JUST to earn points! You have no commitment to anything on the platform! You just want to satisfy your ego, the desire to be higher than someone else! Please grow up and learn to listen to criticism!
@mzaratem Despite what you said, you came first accusing me, saying I was a secondary/fake account of pedeshtrian, and on what basis do you respond?? Not to mention that you accusing me without any proof whatsoever doesn't justify you blocking me just because I offered constructive criticism of your actions!
@mzaratem And you can do that, analyzing other people's IP addresses??
@mzaratem I don't have another account on this platform! If you insist on saying I have multiple accounts, then list them…!
@zkoleva I completely agree with you, it's really annoying when the highlight videos of the match aren't linked to the respective matches!! If the video is talking about a specific match, please link it to the match! It helps both veterans of the platform and newcomers! And I believe that you, @mzaratem , a veteran of the platform and a user who is in the top 3, with all due respect, should have some awareness about this, because I believe that searching for a match and not seeing any video linked to it and having to search around is kind of annoying, right? Not to mention that besides several videos you add not being linked to the matches, you put the wrong hashtag, which is practically the bare minimum to do!
I just think the hashtag is talking about the Paulista Championship, but clearly the video is referring to the Carioca Championship…
I believe the correct thing to do is to put the # of the correct tournament…
But I'm not just talking about this tournament, I've noticed several similar situations (a video from one tournament and a # from another tournament)
@GustavoM I have a simple question: on what grounds would I be banned?
What specific rule did I break to deserve such a threat? I reported a database organization error (the 25/26 vs 26/27 seasons overlap) and I post rumors in the proper Rumors tab with sources.
As a SAC/Support member, your role is to guide, help, and alert users, not to publicly threaten them with bans or send mocking emojis in private. Expressing a technical opinion and seeking database integrity is not a 'crime' or a violation of Volleybox terms. If you are threatening to ban me simply because you disagree with my technical feedback, that is a clear case of power abuse and harassment. I am still waiting for a professional and identified explanation for this 'warning'.
@GustavoM Directly threatening a user by saying they 'will need a new account as soon as possible' simply because they pointed out a database organization error is a clear abuse of power.
If you are indeed from Support, exposing a user in a public forum and sending mocking emojis in private messages (DMs) is a violation of professional ethics and Volleybox's own guidelines. I have followed every rule: I post rumors with sources in the Rumors tab. You, on the other hand, are using your position to harass and intimidate.
@CecíliaCastro To be clear and factual:
- Technical Criticism: My use of the word 'stupid' was directed at the technical action of misplacing 2026/27 rumors in the 2025/26 tab, which ruins the database. I have already apologized for the term, but the technical point remains.
- Point System: You claim I do this for 'points'. Anyone who actually knows the platform knows that rumors do not grant points. My focus is organization, not ranking.
- User Credibility: It is quite strange that a user who registered today is already involving themselves in external forum topics and making accusations. One should have at least a basic understanding of how Volleybox works before lecturing others.
- Official Communication: Threatening someone is never the right way to resolve a conflict. Furthermore, I will no longer respond to alleged 'Support/SAC' messages from accounts created today without any official identification. I will not lower myself to debate with users who refuse to identify themselves properly or follow professional protocols.
If there is a real issue, handle it through the official, private, and identified support channels. I am done with public exposure and veiled threats.
You know that source isn't confirmed, right? And that you shouldn't rely on third-party sources like that—you should look for confirmation from the club, the athlete, or their staff instead.